TorrentProLandscape18Taibbi on Trump the Destroyer. Its like the campaign never ended. Its the same all Trump, all the time madness, only exponentially worse. Morning, February 2. National Harbor, Maryland, the Conservative Political Action Conference. Woodworking Plans Torrent Plans For Building A Workbench With 2 X 4s Woodworking Plans Torrent Writing Desk Plans Free Free Bookcase Design Plans. Torrent Pro Landscape 18' title='Torrent Pro Landscape 18' />Chin up, eyes asquint, Donald Trump floats to the lectern on a sea of applause and adulation. The building is shaking, and as fans howl his name Trump Trump Trump he looks pleased and satisfied, like a Roman emperor who has just moved his bowels. Illustration by Victor JuhaszGreat to be back at CPAC, he says. The place I have really . The thought flies into the air and vanishes. Last year at this time, Trump was bailing on a CPAC invite because a rats nest of National Review types was threatening a walkout to protest him. There was talk of 3. New Yorker was allowed onstage. Whether Trump remembers this now, or just loses his train of thought, he goes silent. We love you a young woman screams, filling the void. If youve ever wondered how a photographer managed to capture the exact moment of an incredible end zone reception or the instant a bird takes flight, the answer. I love this place Trump exclaims, sunnily now. He recalls the tale of his first major political speech, which was delivered to this very conference six years ago. Back then he was introduced to the beat of the OJays soul hit For the Love of Money, and over the course of 1. He starts to tell that story, when suddenly he spots something in the audience that knocks him off script. Siddown, everybody, come on, he says. A lot of the people cant sit down because theyre in standing room only sections. Theres confusion, a few nervous laughs. Frowning, Trump plows ahead. You know, he says, the dishonest media, theyll say, He didnt get a standing ovation. You know why Those of us in the dishonest media section shoot befuddled looks at one another. Not one of us has a clue why. You know why No, you know why he goes on. Sketch Master Plugin Free Download. Because everybody stood and nobody sat. So they will say, He never got a standing ovation. RightThis makes no sense, but the crowd roars anyway. Trump leans over and pauses to soak in the love, his trademark red tie hanging like the tongue of a sled dog. Finally he turns and flashes a triumphant thumbs up. A chant breaks out U S A U S A U S A Reporters stare at one another in shock. G18fK9D.jpg' alt='Torrent Pro Landscape 18' title='Torrent Pro Landscape 18' />They were mute bystanders seconds ago now theyre the 1. Soviet hockey team. One turns to a colleague and silently mouths U S AWhat the f . Nearby, another press nerd is frowning to himself and counting on his fingers, apparently trying to use visual aids to retrace Trumps reasoning. Was the idea that reporters wouldnt notice a standing ovation unless the crowd eventually sat down Helpless shrugs all around. In a flash, Trump is launching into a furious 1. Clinton News Network Trump continually refers to Hillary Clinton as if the campaign were still going on and describing the press as the enemy of the people. Within hours, Trumps aides will bar a group of news outlets from a White House gaggle, in a formal declaration of war against the media. The next morning, a still raging Trump will tweet out his decision not to attend the White House Correspondents Dinner no great loss, since the event has never not been a wretched exercise in stale humor and ankle biting toadyism, but still. How long can he keep up this pace Since winning the election, Trump has declared interpersonal war on a breathtaking list of targets the Australian prime minister, an acting attorney general, seven predominantly Muslim countries, a so called federal judge, Sweden, Fake Tears Chuck Schumer, Saturday Night Live, the FBI, the very un American leakers within the intelligence community, and the city of Paris its no longer Paris. Hes side eyed Mark Cuban, John Mc. Cain, millions of protesters, Lindsey Graham, Richard Blumenthal, Chris Cuomo, the University of California at Berkeley, ratings disaster Arnold Schwarzenegger, Nancy Pelosi, the TRAITOR Chelsea Manning, Mexican President Enrique Pea Nieto, Barack Obama and the city of Chicago, among many, many others. There is no other story in the world, no other show to watch. The first and most notable consequence of Trumps administration is that his ability to generate celebrity has massively increased, his persona now turbocharged by the vast powers of the presidency. Trump has always been a reality star without peer, but now the most powerful man on Earth is prisoner to his talents as an attention generation machine. Worse, he is leader of a society incapable of discouraging him. The numbers bear out that we are living through a severely amplified dj vu of last years media Trump codependent lunacies. TV news viewership traditionally plummets after a presidential election, but under Trump, its soaring. Ratings since November for the major cable news networks are up an astonishing 5. CNN expecting to improve on its record 2. Torrent Pro Landscape 18' title='Torrent Pro Landscape 18' />Even the long suffering newspaper business is crawling off its deathbed, with The New York Times adding 1. If Trump really hates the press, being the first person in decades to reverse the industrys seemingly inexorable financial decline sure is a funny way of showing it. Grand Slam Tennis 2 comes to the sports gaming sphere when fans of the sport already have two other options Top Spin 4 and Virtua Tennis 4. To stand out from its. Daz3d Garden Shed Studio Torrent Keter Fusion Garden Shed Canada Daz3d Garden Shed Studio Torrent Storage Sheds For Sale In El Paso Texas Storage Shed Roanoke Va. Trump the Destroyer. Trump has stuffed his Cabinet with tyrants, zealots and imbeciles all bent on demolishing our government from within. On the campaign trail, ballooning celebrity equaled victory. But as the country is finding out, fame and governance have nothing to do with one another. Trump is bigger than ever. But the Trump presidency is fast withering on the vine in a bizarre, Dorian Gray style inverse correlation. Which would be a problem for Trump, if he cared. But does he During the election, Trump exploded every idea we ever had about how politics is supposed to work. The easiest marks in his con artist conquest of the system were the people who kept trying to measure him according to conventional standards of candidate behavior. You remember the Beltway priests who said no one could ever win the White House by insulting women, the disabled, veterans, Hispanics, the blacks, by using a Charlie Chan voice to talk about Asians, etc. Now hes in office and were again facing the trap of conventional assumptions. Surely Trump wants to rule It couldnt be that the presidency is just a puppy Trump never intended to care for, could it Toward the end of his CPAC speech, following a fusillade of anti media tirades that will dominate the headlines for days, Trump, in an offhand voice, casually mentions what a chore the presidency can be. I still dont have my Cabinet approved, he sighs. In truth, Trump does have much of his team approved. In the early days of his administration, while his Democratic opposition was still reeling from Novembers defeat, Trump managed to stuff the top of his Cabinet with a jaw dropping collection of perverts, tyrants and imbeciles, the likes of which Washington has never seen. En route to taking this crucial first beachhead in his invasion of the capital, Trump did what he always does stoked chaos, created hurricanes of misdirection, ignored rules and dared the system of checks and balances to stop him. By conventional standards, the system held up fairly well. But this is not a conventional president. He was a new kind of candidate and now is a new kind of leader one who stumbles like a drunk up Capitol Hill, but manages even in defeat to continually pull the country in his direction, transforming not our laws but our consciousness, one shriveling brain cell at a time. It seems strange to say about the most overanalyzed person in the world, but Trump arrived in Washington an unknown. How to critique artwork like a pro. Does the thought of an impending art critique bring tears to your eyes Does it make you feel like crying in your Wheatieswho came up with that phrase, anyway For a lot of art students, it certainly does, and can be very intimidating, especially if were not accustomed to speaking in front of an audience. But with a little practice, you too can sound edu ma cated in front of othersIn order properly to critique any given artwork in a way that is acceptable by any institution assigning four digit numbers to its classes, you need only remember the acronym DAIJ. It stands for Description, Analysis, Interpretation, Judgment, or as a clever student in my highschool art class once said, Dem Apples Is Juicy. For an example, I have randomly chosen an artwork to critique by taking a lame, five second long quiz, entitled What Famous Work of Art Are Youthe result of which, for me, was Salvador Dalis Landscape With Butterflies. Okay, so Im not crazy about butterflies, but the opinion part comes later. In order to perform a criticism on any type of art, you simply carry out the 4 steps of DAIJremember, its Description, Analysis, Interpretation, Judgment. Or, if youre really lazy, you could just use this handy Instant Art Critique Phrase Generator that I came across today. Sure, no one will be the wiserBut if you really want to be intelligent, follow the darned steps already Description. Just as it says, first you describe the facts, including the name of the work, artist, medium, etc. Next, what does the art look like, what is it made of, what objects do you see in it What textures, shapes, or colors are there Are the colors vivid and bright, or subdued Remember, all of these are straight facts, with no opinions added yet. If you wanna be really thorough, look for and describe each of the elements of art line, shape, form, color, space, texture and value. Ive also seen time and mass included in others lists, but they seem superfluous to me at this point. Be very general at first, then get more specific later on. The first step goes something like this In this painting, I see butterflies obvious, but necessary. There are two of them, and they are in flight with their wings open. I also see what appears to be the side of a cliff, or a flat wall that has been broken off. It is daytime because the sky is blue, but there is also another drastic light source coming from the right side, creating harsh shadows. The landscape appears to be outdoors, because of the sky and because of the vast desert in the distance. The colors are very intense, especially the blue and the orange. There is a strong contrast between light and dark, and overall, the lines are very defined. The viewer is either very close in proximity to the butterflies, or the butterflies are rather large. As the viewer, we appear to be standing in front of this scene, looking straight at it, and the overall effect is realism. Etc. Note Through all this, you are not supposed to say whether or not you like any of the thingsyoure just describing at this point. Analysis. Next, tell how all the answers from the description you just made are related to each other, ie, how the above facts are organized, compliment one another, or create harmony or distress. This step can often be the most confusing, because it is very similar to the first and can easily overlap. A good suggestion is to think about some of the principles of art movement or rhythm, variety, proportion, emphasis, balance, contrast. I have seen some people list scale as an art principle, but again this seems redundant to meits basically a more detailed word for what we mean by proportion. The Wikipedia entry on design elements and principles is a valuable resource if you need specific help sorting out and defining all of these terms. So put on your detail goggles and dive inAs I view this piece, my eyes are occasionally led over to the vanishing point on the left in the distance, but keep coming back to the focal point around the butterflies. This movement happens largely because of the shadow that the rock casts in that direction. The blue of the sky and the orange of the rock are very intense and bright highly saturated, and their opposition with each other also contributes to the back and forth motion of our eyes as we view the painting. If the blue color was not as saturated, more focus would be on the right side of the painting, it would have too much weight, and our eyes would linger there more. As a result, the paintings composition would be less balanced. Also, because the butterflies appear to be abnormally large in comparison to what we assume is a rock face or cliff, we do not have a concrete sense of scale or proportion. This creates an interesting sense of ambiguity, and as a viewer were not sure if in fact we are very small, or simply lying close to the ground, or if these are mutated giant butterflies next to a huge cliff. Who can be sure There arent even any pebbles on the ground or other recognizable objects in the paintings to give us clues about scale. Free Download Software Idm Full Crack Bagas. The bottom most butterfly shadow as well as the butterflies themselves, and the shadow cast by the rock has a sort of glow around it caused by the lighter orange color surrounding it. This causes the shadow to further emerge from the surface its supposed to be cast on, making it appear more three dimensional and adding focus to it. Pragma Once In Main File'>#Pragma Once In Main File. We know that actual, real life shadows do not have this effect, and so it creates a surreal feelingone of the things Dalis paintings are most famous for. Interpretation. Basically, how does the painting make you feelWhat does it make you think of Dont say you think the artwork sucksNot yet That comes in the next step What do you think the artist is trying to communicate to you as a viewer But just because this step is more open ended than the previous two, and there arent really any right or wrong answers, in my opinion its the most important and fun step. I dont feel either sad or happy when looking at thisThe colors are nice n bright, and butterflies usually make people feel happy, but I mainly feel curious, and maybe a bit confused. Id like to have more details about whats going on that are not available in the painting. The colors to me feel very cool, and even the oranges and browns have a lot of light coolness to them, but the surrounding visuals suggest a desert of some sort, or somewhere very dry. The butterflies are painted fairly realistically, and are beautiful, but the wings on both are stuck in the same exact position, like they are pinned onto an entomologists board. Not to mention their somewhat unrealistic shadows and highlights. So this is what I think Dali probably did I think he found some recently dead butterflies and wanted to paint them, like one would paint a still life with fruit or flowers or something. But to make them less boring than a typical still life of butterflies pinned to a board, he added an imaginary background to make it into a landscape instead. That way, as a viewer, we could have the sense that these creatures are alive and kicking, in their own little colorful world. To me, I think this is a great concept, and a creative way of approaching a painting and making it more intriguing than a plain old still life.